Scientific Dissent on Darwinism
“We are skeptical about the claim that random mutations and natural selection account for the complexity of life. A careful examination of the evidence of Darwinian theory should be encouraged.”
During the last few decades, new scientific data in many fields of science, like cosmology, physics, biology, research in "artificial intelligence" and others have pushed scientists to m
to question the fundamental principle of Darwinism, that natural selection can generate biological complexity, and to study more the evidence that justifies it.
Despite this the TV programs, school ones and scientific textbooks continue to affirm (1) that all known data support Darwin's explanation of the origin of the complexity of living beings, e (2) that virtually all trails
nziati of the world believe that the theory is true.
The scientists on this list refute the first assertion and are living testimony that disproves the second. Since the Discovery Institute launched this list in 2001, hundreds of scientists bravely stepped forward to sign their names.
This list is growing and includes scientists from the US National Academy of Sciences, of the Russian National Academies, Hungarians and Czechoslovakians, of universities such as Yale, Princeton, Stanford, WITH, UC Berkeley, UCLA, and others.
Scientific Dissent On Darwinism
“We are skeptical about the claim that random mutations and natural selection account for the complexity of life. A careful examination of the evidence of Darwinian theory should be encouraged.”
Click here to download a PDF copy of the list “Scientific Dissent On Darwinism”
